Elysabeth

Entries from March 2009

Octoworkers Fired for Snooping on Suleman

March 31, 2009 · 1 Comment

What does a new mother have to do to get a little privacy? You know, other than not sign an exclusive deal to record her life for a website, make multiple appearances on Dr. Phil or affiliate herself with Gloria Allred?

As has befallen Tom Cruise, Britney Spears, Mariah Carey, George Clooney and Farrah Fawcett before her, Octomom Nadya Suleman is the latest (pseudo) celeb to have her privacy breached in the wake of a hospital stay, as Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center today announced that 15 hospital workers have been let go, voluntarily and otherwise, and another eight disciplined for attempting to sneak peaks at Suleman’s medical history.

Two of the staffers were fired, while 13 opted to resign in lieu of termination.

Kaiser Permanente’s SoCal media relations director Jim Anderson said the staffers had accessed Suleman’s file “without having a good reason to do so,” but that an internal investigation by the hospital found that none of the offending workers provided information from the medical records to the media.

In other words, they peeked, but they didn’t leak. At least they haven’t yet.

“Despite the notoriety of this case, to us this person is a patient who deserves the privacy that all our patients get,” Anderson said, who added that the hospital had already reported the breach of privacy to the state’s Department of Public Health.

While Anderson did not disclose the occupations of the ex-employees, he said that they “ran the gamut of medical staff.” In the weeks leading up to the octuplets’ birth earlier this year, employees were trained on the importance of keeping patient information confidential.

A refresher course might be in order.

As for the mother of 14, Suleman said through her attorney Jeffrey Czech that she was not planning to take any legal action against the hospital at this time and that she is “very happy” that officials “will do everything in their power to rectify the situation.”

As for what, exactly, the workers were attempting to discover, Czech told the Orange County Register that he thinks “people were looking for the name of the donor” but the attempts at snooping were probably pointless.

“I don’t think there’s anything in there that isn’t already public,” he said. “Everybody knows everything about these babies anyway.”

Categories: California · California Hospitals · Hospital · Kaiser Permanate · Multiple Children Famalies · Nadya Suleman

Christian Songs with words

March 31, 2009 · Leave a Comment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QscT_kTM14U&feature=related

I am still standing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76CzLxIp1ag

Everywhere that I go

Categories: Christians/Theology · Word of Life Christian Center

American Religious Survey 2008-2009

March 31, 2009 · Leave a Comment

http://b27.cc.trincoll.edu/weblogs/AmericanReligionSurvey-ARIS/reports/ARIS_Report_2008.pdf

Categories: Christians/Theology

In times like these, more people are going to church for help

March 31, 2009 · Leave a Comment

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CONGREGATIONS
Among 1,000 pastors who were asked about the impact of “recent problems in the economy”:

• 62% have had more requests for financial assistance from outside the congregation.

• 40% have members of their congregations who have lost their jobs.

• 37% have increased spending from the church budget to help those who are in need.

• 31% have explored starting new ministries to aid the disadvantaged.

• 31% have had more requests for financial assistance from members of their congregation.

• 27% have paid for more ministry items out of their own pocket than normal.

Source: LifeWay Research survey
of 1,000 pastors, February 2009

PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CONGREGATIONS
PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CONGREGATIONS
Among 1,000 pastors who were asked about the impact of “recent problems in the economy”:

• 62% have had more requests for financial assistance from outside the congregation.

• 40% have members of their congregations who have lost their jobs.

• 37% have increased spending from the church budget to help those who are in need.

• 31% have explored starting new ministries to aid the disadvantaged.

• 31% have had more requests for financial assistance from members of their congregation.

• 27% have paid for more ministry items out of their own pocket than normal.

Source: LifeWay Research survey
of 1,000 pastors, February 2009

Nearly two in three pastors (62%) report more people from outside their church asking for help, and nearly a third (31%) see more such requests from church members, according to a survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors.

The survey, by LifeWay Research, a Christian polling firm based in Nashville, finds that 40% of pastors say they have church members out of work, and 37% say their church has increased spending to help the needy. (The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.

The Rev. Bill Ankerberg has seen it all at his Whittier Area Community Church, east of Los Angeles. The church gave more financial aid to folks in one month, $26,000 from the benevolent fund, than it was asked to give in all of 1996, the year he came to Whittier, he says.

Like 27% of pastors in the survey, Ankerberg has given personally, too.

Last weekend, 1,100 of the Whittier Area church’s 1,800 adult members were signed up to help with more than 112 service projects in area schools, hospitals, homeless shelters and other public sites.

First Family Church in Overland Park, Kan., called all 5,000 members to tell them about a special February Sunday worship service where people who had lost their jobs could come to be anointed with oil by senior pastor Jerry Johnston and his son, Jeremy, the executive pastor.

“We had 2,000 people, the largest worship service turnout of the year,” says the Rev. Jeremy Johnston. “The worship team led the prayers while my dad and I stood in the aisles, and one after another people came forward to be anointed and for prayer. It brought me to tears.”

First Family also has added ministries to support the unemployed, and next month will hold a baby shower for new mothers from 17 shelters in Kansas City.

“We’re going through money a lot faster in terms of helping people with utility bills and shut-offs, and we’re seeing people we have never seen before seek help,” says the Rev. Larry Klinker of historic Zion Lutheran Church in New Middletown, Ohio, where nearly 140 worship on Sundays.

Zion is a distribution site for the Salvation Army, which once gave Zion $5,000 to distribute each year but now has cut back to $3,500.

“I spend more time on counseling now. The difference I see between now and other hard times,” says Klinker, who has spent 27 years at Zion, “is that it’s more pervasive, and there’s a sense of no end in sight.”

Categories: Christians/Theology

Oprah Talks to Michelle Obama

March 31, 2009 · 2 Comments

Our new First Lady on the surprises of life in the White House (“If you want pie, there’s pie! If something breaks, it’s fixed. In an hour”)…the rules she’s laid down for Malia and Sasha (“I want the kids to be treated like children, not little princesses”)…and how she hopes to use “one of the best jobs in the world” to help women transform their lives.

On the second floor of the White House, the Yellow Oval Room—part of the First Family’s private residence—offers a stunning view of the nation’s capital. The Washington Monument stretches into the heavens. The Lincoln Memorial sits above the glassy water of the Reflecting Pool. In the distance, you can see the U.S. Capitol, where the world’s attention was focused on January 20 as millions gathered to witness an event many had thought would never happen. This room is where I interviewed First Lady Michelle Obama in February, and as I gazed out the windows and took in the view, I was struck by the immense legacy she and her family have inherited. I felt the weight of history, and I understood what she means when she says, as she often does, “This is not about us.”

Yet for all the majesty of the White House, the First Lady has already infused it with a palpable ease; her presence makes the place feel open and approachable. When we sit down to talk, she seems as relaxed as she did when I first interviewed her and her husband in their Chicago apartment in 2004. “This room has the best light in the house,” she tells me as we settle in, shoes off, on a comfortable sofa. “And there’s pie here, too. The pie in the White House is dangerously good.”

The Obamas packed up their belongings in Chicago and headed for Washington in early January so 10-year-old Malia and 7-year-old Sasha could get started at their new school. A few weeks later, Michelle and her mother, Marian Robinson, began settling the family into their new home. When I returned to Chicago after the inauguration, I spent the weekend thinking, “I wonder what the Obamas are doing now?” Later, when I was looking for some cough syrup in my medicine cabinet, I suddenly thought, “Michelle never has to go out to buy cough syrup again!” For the First Lady and her family, it’s a whole new reality. As we talk, she tells me how they’re adjusting—and what she’s planning to do in her awesome new role.
— Oprah

Oprah: I had heart palpitations coming through the White House gate, recognizing that this really is now your home. It’s the White House, and it’s your home.

Michelle Obama: And it’s a beautiful home. When you go out and come back, especially at night, with all the white lights on—it’s just beautiful. We feel privileged, and we feel a responsibility to make it feel like the people’s house. We have the good fortune of being able to sleep here, but this house belongs to America.

Oprah: Your saying that makes me feel different than I’ve ever felt about the White House. When you say that, I actually do now, for the first time, think, “Yeah, it is the people’s house.” How did you come to understand that so clearly?

Michelle Obama: Well, I had some time to think about it, because we ran for so long…

Oprah: The longest run anybody’s ever seen.

Michelle Obama: Right. And at some point, you start thinking about what living here would really mean. I’ve taken Barack’s mantra: This isn’t about us. There’s so much history here that no one family can claim this space as their own.
Oprah: So when did it hit you?

Michelle Obama: I don’t think it has. Everything’s been moving at the speed of light. The whole process of transitioning here, the inauguration, all the protocol, seeing to it that the girls are doing well—I’ve really just been trying to make sure everything gets done.

Oprah: I can’t imagine what the inauguration was like for you. For me, it felt like a moment in time that had been coming since time began.

Michelle Obama: I definitely sensed that, standing on the Capitol steps. But I would love to see a tape of what was going on down on the Mall. Because when you hear from people who were there, they talk about the emotions and the calm and the fact that you had more than a million people descending on this very small city with no incident, all love—I long to know that feeling as well.

Oprah:
What was your prayer the night before you moved into the White House?

Michelle Obama: That we stay whole as a family through this process. And when Barack and I talked, he said he wanted to get through the day with everyone intact, everyone who attended—he said he would feel good when every last visitor left safely. And fortunately that happened.

Oprah: Every last visitor. Every train. Every bus. There were so many people. And all of them had their eyes on you. Were you in your body?

Michelle Obama: Oh, I was in it. And it was pretty cold.

Oprah: One of my favorite, favorite moments was during the parade—the two of you getting out of the car and walking, and your arms are linked and your head is sort of on his shoulder. I loved that. But I wondered about the conversation before you got out. Did you just suddenly say, “Look, we’re going to walk for a while now”?

Michelle Obama: We were trying to see if the girls wanted to get out. They were like, “No”—they wanted to stay in the car. And while we were out, they were partying in there—when we got back in, they had the music blaring. But Barack and I felt that walking outside was a natural extension of the campaign: “Okay, we can’t come over to you, we can’t hug you—can’t do that—but we can be out here waving.” Of course, then there was a point where we felt like, “Whoa, three blocks is long.” My feet started hurting.

Oprah:
How did your feet feel at the seventh ball that night?

Michelle Obama: What a good workout, right? I just remembered that even though it was the seventh ball for me, it was the first ball for everyone there. I thought about that during the parade, too. I thought, “I’m going to stand here and cheer for every last person, because this is why they came—to walk in front of the president of the United States.”

Oprah: Weren’t you freezing?

Michelle Obama: I was a little cube of ice. My coat had layers, but from the legs down, I was cold. I would have loved to be wearing a pair of warm, toasty boots.Oprah: But your shoes looked good! So after the inauguration, what was your first weekend in the White House like?

Michelle Obama: Well, we still had family here, so it was almost like a wedding. A huge, very complicated wedding. The last visitors didn’t leave until Sunday. And then the first Monday was kind of weird. You know: “Now we live here, and Barack is getting up and going to work, and it’s just us. This is our home now.” But the kids didn’t act any differently.

Oprah: They didn’t?

Michelle Obama: No. They have been so steady and rock solid that I pinch myself sometimes. Sometimes I pinch them—are you real? Because they’ve adjusted so well. And that was always my concern: How are they going to do? How is this going to be for these little precious girls who were doing just fine in Chicago and had a happy life? But once I saw them thriving—not just living, but thriving, happy, excited about their day and very much focused on their world—that’s when I was able to breathe.

Oprah: And how are you adjusting? What are your days like?

Michelle Obama: My day is structured so that I’m usually not working until 10 or 10:30. That gives me time to get the girls out of the house. My mom is taking them to school because it’s less of a scene for her. With all the security involved, it’s a more normal experience for them when I don’t go.

Oprah: What do people at school call you? First Lady? Mrs. Obama?

Michelle Obama: When I introduce myself, I usually say, “Hi, I’m Michelle—Malia and Sasha’s mom.” And then when you sit down with another parent and have a conversation, all the titles melt away anyway, and you’re just talking about your kids. But to get back to your question, after I see the girls off, I usually work until 3 or 4. Then they’re back and we start in on homework. Then Dad comes home and we all have dinner. That’s the beauty of living above the office: Barack is home every day. The four of us sit down to eat as a family. We haven’t had that kind of normalcy for years. And now I can just pop over to his office, which sometimes I’ll do if I know he’s having a particularly frustrating day.

Oprah: You pop over to the Oval Office?

Michelle Obama: Yes. I’ll just pop over and say hi. And all of this—this being together as a family—is what has made the transition easy. We have each other, in a really fundamental way.

Oprah: What are weekends like?

Michelle Obama: We’re still getting the kids’ activities schedule straight. They’re trying to figure out what they want to do. Sasha has played basketball—

Oprah: She’s coming up in the basketball tradition.

Michelle Obama: I know, Barack’s losing his mind. I was like, “Settle down—don’t act too excited, or she will not want to do it.”Oprah: And how is your mother doing? I am so impressed with her. We had a conversation right before you moved, and she said she was going to make sure you all had your dinners as a family—but that she would not be at the table.

Michelle Obama: I know.

Oprah: When I asked her why, she said, “Because that’s Michelle’s family.”

Michelle Obama: My mom has some really wise approaches to family. But there are times when we’re like, “Mom, come down here.”

Oprah: She originally wanted her own apartment.

Michelle Obama: And I told her, “You can live right here and never even see us if you don’t want to!”

Oprah: She told me that the reason she decided to live here is that she didn’t want you and the president to have to pay for her to have her own place.

Michelle Obama: Oh, that’s good. We’re cheap, for sure. And I bet she said so!

Oprah: But there is a lot of room here.

Michelle Obama: Plenty of room. There are many times when she drops off the kids, we hang out and talk and catch up, and then she’s like, “I’m going home.” And she walks upstairs.

Oprah: Like she’s going across town. So she’s adjusting well to living in Washington?

Michelle Obama: Yes. She’s made friends, she’s had visitors, she’s been to the Kennedy Center more than I have. She was actually so busy one weekend that she forgot to check my schedule. Then she thought, “Well, maybe Michelle’s going to need me Sunday.” And I said, “Actually, yeah, the first state dinner is Sunday. But we’ll get a babysitter. Don’t worry.” [Laughter.] Pretty soon she’s going to come and say, “You know, I can’t pick those kids up, I’ve got so much going on.”

Oprah: What’s it like to walk into a world where you have so many people available to handle your every need? You’ve gone from doing everything, managing your whole household, getting the kids off to school, picking up your own cough syrup…

Michelle Obama: Going to Target…

Oprah: Going to Target—and now you walk into this world…

Michelle Obama: Where, if you want pie, there’s pie. If something breaks, it’s fixed. In an hour. Look, I appreciate it.

Oprah: How many people are on the staff?

Michelle Obama: There are about 95 people who manage the residence. But I want it to feel like home, so it’s important for me to get to know the people we work with, to be able to joke with them and tease them.Oprah: Before you moved in, you said you wanted the girls to keep making their own beds and doing chores. Is the staff on board with that?

Michelle Obama: It took a second. At first they were like, “Are you sure?” But if these girls don’t learn how to make a bed or clean a room, what are they going to do when they go to college? It can’t be foreign to them to be part of a working household. So in the first few days, I gathered my East Wing team and the residence staff—the folks who clean the chandeliers, the people in the kitchen, everyone—and thanked them for helping us transition through the move. Then I talked about our vision for this house: that it would be filled with life, that we’d have people in and out, that the kids would roam around. I want the kids to be treated like children, not little princesses. I told everyone that they should make their beds, they should clean their plates, they should act respectfully—and that if anyone on the staff sees differently, they should come to me. So the girls help set the table, they help bring the food out, they work with the butler staff, and they’re in the kitchen laughing and making their toast in the morning. And everyone has adjusted to the rules. Now I joke with the staff: “Don’t spoil them—spoil Mom!”

Oprah: You can handle it!

Michelle Obama: I can handle it.

Oprah:
There’s a solidness about the girls—a groundedness—that speaks to the great work you’ve done as a mother. What are you most proud of in terms of raising them?

Michelle Obama: It’s that: that they’re so steady. And that they’re kind—to each other, and to other children. It’s important to me that they have empathy. I want them to be able to think, “Well, I could see how that person feels and why that would hurt.” And to make decisions not just based on their own needs but on what’s going on around them.

Oprah: How are they with each other?

Michelle Obama: There’s genuine love and affection. I’m big on the idea that their sister is all each of them has. Even when they argue, I want them to act with respect. I say, “Do you know how painful it is for a mother to watch her two children, who she loves equally, arguing?” I say, “You don’t see it much, but the one or two times you’ve seen Dad and me disagree, you started falling apart.” And they get it.

Oprah: Are there fewer arguments between you and the president now that you don’t have to fix things around the house?

Michelle Obama: Absolutely. That was kind of a growth point in our marriage that I’ve talked about before—the stress of needing help, and then finally realizing that the help doesn’t necessarily have to come from your husband. It can come from anywhere.

Oprah: You seemed to grow together over the course of the campaign. The connection between the two of you seemed to intensify.

Michelle Obama:
When you work on something really hard together and enjoy the successes and challenges with each other, and then get through it not just whole but stronger—you realize how blessed you are, how much love you have together. So, yes, I think we’ve grown. But not just me and Barack. It’s the girls, too. And our whole extended family.

Oprah: And how have you managed to stay in touch with family and friends?

Michelle Obama: That’s the thing about being the First Lady: You try to catch your friends up on what’s happening in your life, and they’re like, “We know—we read it in the paper.”

Oprah: “We saw it in the Tribune.”

Michelle Obama: So we get to see friends—we’ve been back to Chicago—but I think people will wind up coming here to visit us because…

Oprah: It’s hard to travel when you’re First Lady.

Michelle Obama: It is. You know, you asked me when it hit me that all this was really happening. I’ll tell you when it hit me. There was a moment before our first visit to the White House, when we came to meet the Bushes. I had flown in early to visit a school, and then I went back to the airport so Barack and I could ride to the White House together. As we drove up, my Secret Service agent said, “There’s the president-elect’s motorcade.” And there were like 20 cars! There was everything in that motorcade except the caboose! Now I tease Barack: “You’ve got the horse and carriage, the dogsled, the airplane, the bike…”

Oprah: And the kids know he’s home when they hear his helicopter landing.

Michelle Obama: Once someone on my staff e-mailed to tell me that the president was on his way. But you could already hear the helicopter, so it was like, well, no kidding.

Oprah: “Dad’s home!”

Michelle Obama: The girls don’t move. I’m like, “You want to see Daddy landing in the helicopter?” “No, that’s okay. We already saw it.”Oprah: Is living in the White House fun?

Michelle Obama: There’s fun every day. I have one of the best jobs in the world. Because I don’t have to fix the economy, thank goodness. Yet I get to go say hello to the people who make this government work, who hold us up and who will still be here after we’re gone. I get to go read to kids. We’re also working on a wonderful new garden project.

Oprah: Will kids get to visit the garden?

Michelle Obama: We want to use it as a point of education, to talk about health and how delicious it is to eat fresh food, and how you can take that food and make it part of a healthy diet. You know, the tomato that’s from your garden tastes very different from one that isn’t. And peas—what is it like to eat peas in season? So we want the White House to be a place of education and awareness. And hopefully kids will be interested because there are kids living here. We’re even putting a swing set on the South Lawn.

Oprah: So Dad can look out from the Oval Office and see the girls.

Michelle Obama: Yes—though I hope the swing set won’t be just for the Obama girls. I want the staff to feel that they can bring their children to the place where they work and let them feel connected to what their parents do.

Oprah: It’s wonderful that you want to be so inclusive. But do you get privacy when you need it?

Michelle Obama: Absolutely—as much as we need. This is our home, and everyone treats it that way. There is a great deal of respect and decorum around the residence.

Oprah: How will the decorating style change?

Michelle Obama: It will reflect our family. I want comfortable sofas, I want art that reflects contemporary and traditional, I want to bring in new American artisans.

Oprah: You want more than just a few plates on the walls. You want pieces that are inclusive of American culture.

Michelle Obama: Right. And we want approachable comfort.

Oprah: So you can take off your shoes.

Michelle Obama: And you’ve got to be able to make a fort with the sofa pillows! Everything must be fort-worthy.Oprah: Okay, shifting gears now. How are you a different woman today than you were when Barack Obama announced his candidacy in 2007?

Michelle Obama: I’m more optimistic. More hopeful. It comes from traveling all over America and connecting with so many different people. And this was long before anyone thought Barack had a chance. This was the kindness of strangers. I think we should all have to get to know one another around kitchen tables. It changed me. It’s helped me to give other people the benefit of the doubt.

Oprah: What did you see that changed you?

Michelle Obama: I saw our shared values. We fundamentally want the same things for ourselves and for each other. We want our kids to be safe and to grow up with some resources and aspire to a slightly better life than ours. No one’s looking for a handout. People just want fairness and opportunity.

Oprah: That’s so good to hear. Because you know what? We live in an American Idol culture where it seems like everyone just wants to be in the spotlight.

Michelle Obama: That’s not the America I saw. People value their communities. They’re rooting for one another. Even in places where I thought people wouldn’t accept or relate to me, I always walked out feeling like, “Wow—that was fun.” That changed me. And it helped prepare me for this. Because I think if you’re going to be First Lady, you have to believe in the possibility of what this country stands for. You have to see it in action and know what you’re working toward.

Oprah: That’s so interesting—and it all came from sitting around kitchen tables. Speaking of which, did you change your diet during the campaign?

Michelle Obama: When we first started running, my big concern was making sure we ate well on the road. So we started looking at our diet, trying to eliminate junk, getting seasonal fruits and vegetables that were grown locally. We walked the kids through reading labels. We talked about why one juice might be better than another.

Oprah: What foods did you give up?

Michelle Obama: Things with artificial ingredients. That’s a tough change for a lot of families, though, because so many foods aren’t real anymore. But lots of people don’t have access to a farmers’ market, or can’t afford to shop at one, so this is a bigger issue. It’s really big, because changing your diet makes such a difference. I’ve seen it in my own family. We have more energy. And I caught only one cold during the last year of the campaign, even after shaking millions of hands!

Oprah:
On the campaign trail, weren’t people offering you every kind of food imaginable?

Michelle Obama: Yes, and a lot of times, I’d eat it. Hey, I love pie. I love a good candy bar. And sometimes when you’re working so hard, the only thing you have is that candy bar and those potato chips. But if I went home to a balanced diet, then those days wouldn’t kill me. I feel the same about the girls. If they’re eating healthy most times, I don’t panic when they get popcorn at the movies. I don’t want them freaking out about food.

Oprah: That’s right. In addition to eating well, do you work out?

Michelle Obama: Yes. There’s a small gym here that has everything we need. I work out about four or five days a week—and Barack does six. He’s a workout zealot.

Oprah: Well, you look better than ever—despite the rumors that you’ve got a baby bump.

Michelle Obama: [Laughter.] I know—I was like, “Baby bump? As hard as I work on my abs?!”

Oprah: By the way, nobody would be happier if you were pregnant than Gayle King. Out of nowhere, she’ll tell me, “Oh God, I really hope Michelle gets pregnant—and that it’s a boy!”

Michelle Obama: [More laughter.] Here’s the scoop: Not pregnant. And not planning on it.

Oprah: Not pregnant.

Michelle Obama: Not pregnant.Oprah: Okay, so that’s settled. Back to exercise. You do treadmill?

Michelle Obama: I do treadmill, I do weights—

Oprah: I think anyone who saw you on the cover of Vogue knows you do weights. Those arms!

Michelle Obama: I also do some jump rope, some kickboxing—and I’d like to take up Pilates, if I could figure out whether there’s time. After I had Malia, I began to prioritize exercise because I realized that my happiness is tied to how I feel about myself. I want my girls to see a mother who takes care of herself, even if that means I have to get up at 4:30 so I can do a workout.

Oprah: When you first told me that a few years ago, I was like, “You get up at 4:30 to work out?”

Michelle Obama: Well, I just started thinking, if I had to get up to go to work, I’d get up and go to work. If I had to get up to take care of my kids, I’d get up to do that. But when it comes to yourself, then it’s suddenly, “Oh, I can’t get up at 4:30.” So I had to change that. If I don’t exercise, I won’t feel good. I’ll get depressed. Of course, it’s easier to do it here, because I have much more support now. But I always think about women who don’t have support. That’s why work-family balance isn’t just a policy conversation; it’s about changing the expectations of who we have to be as women and parents.

Oprah: What you mentioned earlier is key: We have to ask for help. You can’t do it all. It’s impossible.

Michelle Obama: That’s a conversation I’d love for us to have as a society. How do we set expectations that are attainable?

Oprah: And how do we change the perception of what women should be able to handle? Parents have always needed help—but our generation decided that women should somehow do everything. Yet for thousands and thousands of years, parents had kids so that the kids could help them!

Michelle Obama: And we once lived in small enough communities where people could help each other. Families were together. That’s how I grew up. My grandmother lived around the corner, my grandfather lived two blocks away, they each lived with aunts and uncles. My paternal grandparents lived maybe ten blocks away. It was rare to see a family where one person was trying to cook, clean, watch the kids, do it all. You always had a community. But nowadays people have to move away from their community just to find a job. And then they’re leaving their support base. So we have to acknowledge that that’s going on and ask what it does to the family structure and what it means in terms of how we have to reengineer support.

Oprah: Your saying that out loud is so powerful for women. And liberating. You’re a mighty force. You know, I’ve wondered: Do you feel the glare of the fishbowl?

Michelle Obama: I don’t pay attention to it. There isn’t a bigger fishbowl, but I don’t own the glare.Oprah: Now that your husband is president, everybody has an opinion about what he should or should not be doing. How do you handle that? I sometimes get offended—and I’m not married to him!

Michelle Obama: We live in the experience that we’re actually having. In just a few weeks, my husband got a stimulus bill passed and made some amazing policy changes that will affect people’s lives in a fundamentally positive way. I’m so proud of him. That’s the reality. Everything else is just what comes with the territory. The people who disagree with Barack don’t dislike him; they just disagree. That’s what democracy is about. But at some point, you’ve got to make a decision and move forward, and your hope is that people will give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re making decisions based on what you think is best for the country.

Oprah: Gayle once interviewed you for her radio show and was blown away by something you said: that your husband has never disappointed you. Gayle was like, “I can’t believe that!”

Michelle Obama: Barack is a human being with flaws. And I can rattle down all the flaws and tease him about them every day, but those flaws are not fundamental. They don’t hit upon things that are intolerable to me. In terms of his core values, he has never disappointed me. He is a very consistent person—which is why I knew unequivocally that he would be a phenomenal president. He is steady. Has he made me mad? Yes. Does he sometimes do things that I don’t like? Absolutely.

Oprah: That’s called marriage.

Michelle Obama: But as a human being, he has never disappointed. And I would hope he could say the same about me. Ask him!

Oprah: I will. First chance I get. Has your love deepened during this whole process?

Michelle Obama: Absolutely. I don’t lose sight of the fact that he’s the president, but first and foremost he’s my husband, my friend, and the father of my children. That didn’t change with his hand on the Lincoln Bible. But it doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate the gravity of what he’s doing. The way I can honor that is by working by his side and adding value to what he’s doing in any way that I can. That’s my part in this. That’s why I’m out there trying to be an aid and a support to his vision and his values. I am supporting the president of the United States.

Oprah: It seems that every woman I speak to—black, white, older, younger—says the same thing about you: “She’s just like us.” People feel an affection for you that I find so touching.

Michelle Obama: I’ve always thought that what I owe the American people is to let them see who I am so there are no surprises. I don’t want to be anyone but Michelle Obama. And I want people to know what they’re getting.

Oprah: What I see in you is a confidence that comes from such an authentic place. A reporter who interviewed me 10 years after she’d first met me said, “Gee, you’re the same person—but it feels like you’ve become more of yourself.” When did you get to be this much of yourself?

Michelle Obama: I think in my 40s, I started feeling very comfortable in my own skin. Motherhood helps, marriage helps—those learning curves that force you to be better. And my hope is that my 50s will hone that. I never consider myself a finished project.

O: So what do you know for sure, Michelle Obama?

Michelle Obama: I know that all I can do is be the best me that I can. And live life with some gusto. Giving back is a big part of that. How am I going to share this experience with the American people? I’m always thinking about that.

Categories: Barack Obama and Family · Malia Obama · Marian Robinson · Michelle Obama · Obama · Sasha Obama

Fat infants at risk of being obese toddlers: study

March 31, 2009 · 8 Comments

CHICAGO (Reuters) – Infants who gain too much weight as babies are more likely to grow into obese toddlers, showing the importance of early eating habits, researchers said on Monday.

Watching children while they eat for cues about when they are full and encouraging them to drink plenty of water may help control their weight, according to two studies in the journal Pediatrics.

Obesity rates among U.S. children have doubled in the last 20 years, and almost a third of American children are either overweight or obese. The epidemic of obesity is linked to a host of health problems such as higher risks for heart disease, diabetes and cancer.

Researchers at Harvard University and Children’s Hospital, Boston, divided 559 children into four groups based on measurements of their weights and heights at birth, six months and age 3. Nearly one of 10 children were obese at 3.

Those heaviest at birth and those gaining the most weight through age 6 months together had a 40 percent higher probability of being obese at age 3.

“(This) suggests that it is rapid weight gain in infancy that puts children at risk” more than heavy birth weight, Elsie Taveras and fellow researchers wrote.

Obesity at age 3 does not necessarily translate into obesity later in childhood or adulthood, but it raises the risks, they said.

The Harvard researchers said it was important to educate parents and other caregivers to improve infant diets and to help them recognize when children are full.

A second study in the journal by Rebecca Muckelbauer and colleagues at the Research Institute of Child Nutrition in Dortmund, Germany, found an easy way to keep children from gaining too much weight was to encourage them to drink more water.

Water fountains were installed in schools in poor areas of Dortmund and Essen, Germany, and 1,641 second- and third-graders were urged to drink more water. They drank the equivalent of an extra glass of water a day compared to children not given the encouragement.

Those who drank more water lowered their risk of becoming overweight by 31 percent.

Categories: Children and parenting · Health · Health and eating · Nutrition · Obese

School PE Programs Don’t Lower Child Obesity

March 31, 2009 · Leave a Comment

MONDAY, March 30 (HealthDay News) — Physical fitness programs in schools improve many aspects of children’s health, but they don’t appear to combat obesity, a new study in the Canadian medical publication CMAJ shows.

Improvements in blood pressure, muscle mass, bone mineral density, lung capacity and flexibility were some of the benefits experienced by the more than 18,000 students participating in “physical activity interventions” at their schools; however, the program’s did not noticeably lower the children’s body-mass index (BMI) — a common measurement of obesity.

The study authors, from the BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, concluded that the program’s overall health benefits still warrant their inclusion in school curriculum, even if they don’t reduce obesity.

The failure to reduce BMI scores might have been because the programs did not offer enough vigorous activity or that other outside factors may have had a greater effect on weight, the authors suggested.

The rate of childhood obesity in the United States has tripled in the past 40 years and similar increases are occurring in Canada and most of Europe, according to background information in the article.

Louise Baur, from the University of Sydney in Australia, in a commentary in the same issue of CMAJ, writes that reversing trends in childhood obesity requires a broader, long-term approach — from healthier school meals to changes in how cities are developed so that they encourage more physical activity.

“No simple or short-term changes, such as a physical activity intervention for a limited length of time in the school curriculum, can be expected to influence the prevalence of obesity,” wrote Baur, who specializes in children’s health.

Categories: Education · Obese

Rapid Infant Weight Gain Linked to Childhood Obesity

March 31, 2009 · 4 Comments

MONDAY, March 30 (HealthDay News) — Babies who gain weight quickly during the first six months of life may be more prone to obesity as toddlers, Harvard researchers report.

“We need to start our preventive methods when children are much younger,” said study author Dr. Elsie M. Taveras. “Even in the first couple of weeks of life, we can start guiding parents about how to prevent rapid weight gain in their infants.”

While past research has established a link between birth weight and obesity, the impact of factors such as length of gestation, height and lifestyle of the mother were often not considered.

The researchers tracked 559 children who were part of Project Viva, an ongoing study of pregnant women and their children. The babies were measured for weight and height at birth, at 6 months and again at the age of 3.

After adjusting for factors such as the babies’ length, researchers found that those who increased their body-mass index (BMI) during their first six months were more likely to be classified as obese at age 3.

“At present, most guidelines around obesity management recommend that we start assessment and treatment of children after the age of 2,” Taveras said.

According to the National Institutes of Health, nearly a third of adults in the United States are obese. Obese people are 10 percent to 50 percent more likely to die of all causes. In 2000, the obesity epidemic cost the U.S. health system $117 billion.

“The key indication for this study is the importance of better education about feeding infants,” said Connie Diekman, director of university nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis. “Since the study did not look at what children were fed after weaning, it is hard to know if overfeeding then is a contributor.”

Addressing this issue may involve simply making minor changes. In Germany, water fountains were installed in 32 schools located in poor areas of two German cities. Teachers then presented four lesson plans to second- and third-grade students about the benefits of water consumption.

The study found that the students who attended these schools were 31 percent less likely to become overweight than those who attended other schools not involved in the study.

Both studies are to be published in the April issue of Pediatrics.

“The researchers themselves identified that we need to study caregiver and infant relationships, since other studies have shown when there is a lack of a bonding during feeding, infants will change what they eat,” says Diekman. “In addition, other potential confounders need to be removed, and then the study repeated, to see if weight gain during pregnancy is a factor.”

“Our study raises a lot of questions about the reason rapid infant weight gain results in obesity later on,” Taveras said. “We need more research to identify the factors that explain this relationship.”

Categories: Children and parenting · Health · Obese

Scientists Identify More Breast Cancer Genes

March 31, 2009 · 1 Comment

MONDAY, March 30 (HealthDay News) — U.S. researchers say they’ve spotted new gene variations that could boost the risk of sporadic breast cancer.

The same team also confirmed previously identified associations between certain regions in the human genome and breast cancer risk.

The newly identified genetic variations are located on chromosomes 1 and 14. The region on chromosome 1 contained the rs11249433 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). SNPs, the most common type of genetic variation, affect just a single building block of DNA.

The function of the rs11249433 SNP is unknown, but the region on chromosome 1 where it’s located is predominately associated with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, the most common molecular type of breast cancer, the researchers said.

The region identified on chromosome 14 includes the rs999737 SNP, which is located near a gene called RAD51L1, which is a pathway implicated in breast cancer.

The Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) team also confirmed previous studies that found that six other genomic regions — located on chromosomes 2, 5, 8, 10 and 16 — are associated with breast cancer. Further study of all these regions may help improve understanding of what causes breast cancer.

“By studying large populations of individuals with and without disease, CGEMS research can provide powerful indicators as to which SNP variations are associated with breast cancer,” Dr. Stephen Chanock, director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Core Genotyping Facility and chief of the Laboratory of Translational Genomics in the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, said in an NCI news release.

“The two new regions identified in our study open up great possibilities for research into novel pathways contributing to the development of breast cancer. In turn, an in-depth understanding of the biology underlying the contribution of these genetic variations could one day lead to new approaches for therapy or prevention of breast cancer,” he said.

The study was published online March 29 in the journal Nature Genetics.

Categories: Cancer · Health

100,000 secular Britons seek ‘de-baptism’

March 31, 2009 · 4 Comments

LONDON (AFP) – More than 100,000 Britons have recently downloaded “certificates of de-baptism” from the Internet to renounce their Christian faith.

The initiative launched by a group called the National Secular Society (NSS) follows atheist campaigns here and elsewhere, including a London bus poster which triggered protests by proclaiming “There’s probably no God.”

“We now produce a certificate on parchment and we have sold 1,500 units at three pounds (4.35 dollars, 3.20 euros) a pop,” said NSS president Terry Sanderson, 58.

John Hunt, a 58-year-old from London and one of the first to try to be “de-baptised,” held that he was too young to make any decision when he was christened at five months old.

The male nurse said he approached the Church of England to ask it to remove his name. “They said they had sought legal advice and that I should place an announcement in the London Gazette,” said Hunt, referring to one of the official journals of record of the British government.

So that’s what he did — his notice of renouncement was published in the Gazette in May 2008 and other Britons have followed suit.

Michael Evans, 66, branded baptising children as “a form of child abuse” — and said that when he complained to the church where he was christened he was told to contact the European Court of Human Rights.

The Church of England said its official position was not to amend its records. “Renouncing baptism is a matter between the individual and God,” a Church spokesman told AFP.

“We are not a ‘membership’ church, and do not keep a running total of the number of baptised people in the Church of England, and such totals do not feature in the statistics that we regularly publish,” he added.

De-baptism organisers say the initiative is a response to what they see as increasing stridency from churches — the latest last week when Pope Benedict XVI stirred global controversy on a trip to AIDS-ravaged Africa by saying condom use could further spread of the disease.

“The Catholic Church is so politically active at the moment that I think that is where the hostility is coming from,” said Sanderson. “In Catholic countries there is a very strong feeling of wanting to punish the church by leaving it.”

In Britain, where government figures say nearly 72 percent of the population list themselves as Christian, Sanderson feels this “hostility” is fuelling the de-baptism movement.

Theologian Paul Murray at Durham University disagrees. “That is not my experience,” he said, but concedes that change is in the air.

“We are in an interesting climate where Catholicism and other belief systems have moved into the public, pluralist arena, alongside secularists,” he said.

De-baptism movements have already sprung up in other countries.

In Spain, the high court ruled in favour of a man from Valencia, Manuel Blat, saying that under data protection laws he could have the record of his baptism erased, according to a report in the International Herald Tribune.

Similarly, the Italian Union of Rationalists and Agnostics (UAAR) won a legal battle over the right to file for de-baptism in 2002, according to media reports. The group’s website carries a “de-baptism” form to facilitate matters.

According to UAAR secretary Raffaele Carcano, more than 60,000 of these forms have been downloaded in the past four years and continue to be downloaded at a rate of about 2,000 per month. Another 1,000 were downloaded in one day when the group held its first national de-baptism day last October 25.

Elsewhere, an Argentinian secularist movement is running a “Collective Apostasy” campaign, using the slogan “Not in my name” (No en mi nombre).

Sanderson hopes rulings in other European countries will pave the way for legal action in Britain, since European Union directives require a level of parity among member states’ legislation.

“That would be a good precedent for us to say to the British Information Commissioner: Come on, what’s your excuse?” said Sanderson.

The bus-side posters that hit London in January sported the message: “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.”

The scheme was in response to pro-Christian adverts on buses directing passers-by to a website warning those who did not accept Jesus would suffer for eternity in hell.

Comedy writer Ariane Sherine, mastermind of the British bus campaign that saw a copycat version in Barcelona and other cities, said she backs the “de-baptism” movement but insisted the two initiatives were separate.

Sanderson meanwhile remains resolute. “The fact that people are willing to pay for the parchments shows how seriously they are taking them,” he said.

Categories: Christians/Theology · UK